Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TUNTUN SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Tuntun Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 26368 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20443 (1 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the F.I.R. the applicant did not cause any injury. Only the applicant was present at the time of the alleged offence. The co-accused Sonu Singh has been released on bail by this court on 2.11.2006 in criminal misc. bail application no. 23249 of 2006. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to get the benefit of parity.

In reply of the above submission it is contended by the learned A.G.A. that the applicant is a very powerful persons. If he is released on bail, he shall tamper with the evidence.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Tuntun Singh    involved in case crime no. 832 of 2006  under Sections 147,148,149,504,302  I.P.C., and section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act  P.S. Srailakhansi     District Mau  be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial.    

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel and the applicant shall be taken in custody.

Dated: 1.12.2006

NA/26368/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.