High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Neeraj v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 26508 of 2006  RD-AH 20482 (4 December 2006)
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant , learned A.G.A.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. His name was disclosed by first informant in his statement recorded by the I.O., but his name has been disclosed in the second statement. The naming of the applicant is after thought. Co-accused Raj Kumar, whose case is on the same footing with the case of the applicant, has been released on bail by this court on 28.11.2006 in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 25945 of 2006.
In reply the learned A.G.A. submits that that applicant is having criminal antecedents.
After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Neeraj involved in Case Crime No. 289 of 2006, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 506 and 120-B I.P.C. Police Station Hapur Nagar District Ghaziabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall report to the court of learned C.J. M. concerned in the first week of each month about his behaviour and good conduct till the conclusion of the trial. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.
In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel and the applicant shall be taken into custody by the learned C.J.M. concerned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.