Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJ KUMAR & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Raj Kumar & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 7376 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20486 (4 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.

Hon'ble Vijay Kumar Verma, J.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have perused the judgment in question also.

Admit.

Connect this appeal with Criminal Appeal No. 7238/06 filed by co-accused Sanjay.

Office is directed to summon the trial court record within a period of eight weeks.

List immediately thereafter for consideration of bail prayer of appellants-Raj Kumar and Chhangi.

Accused Sanjay has been convicted by the trial court under Section 363 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. He was not found guilty under Sections 366 and 376 I.P.C. He has been sentenced to suffer R.I. for a period of five years only under Section 363 I.P.C. and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- only. He was on bail during trial and did not misuse the liberty of bail.

After having considered the accusation levelled against him and the role assigned to him in the crime, we find it appropriate to enlarge the appellant (Sanjay @ Sanju) on bail during pendency of the appeal.

Let the appellant-Sanjay @ Sanju be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on his executing a personal bond and furnishing bonds of two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aligarh in S.T. No. 97 of 2002 State Vs. Raj Kumar and others.

The appellant (Sanjay @ Sanju) is allowed one month time from today to deposit the entire amount of fine in the court below.

4.12.2006

OP/7376/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.