Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TAJ MOHAMMAD AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Taj Mohammad And Others v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 5009 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 2051 (25 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Civil  Misc. W.P. No.  5009 of 2006

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.

Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.

The contract period is already over 4 years ago. No agreement was executed. Now after 4 years, the respondents want an agreement to be executed for a contract the period of which is already over and they are demanding stamp duty. The execution of the agreement after 4 years of the expiry of the contract period is meaningless and ridiculous.

Issue notice to the opposite party No. 4.

In the meantime, the operation of the impugned notices enclosed as annexure-1 to this writ petition will remain stayed.  

Dated : January 25, 2006

AM/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.