Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM SANEHI AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Sanehi And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 16306 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20581 (5 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the F.I.R. the role of catching hold is assigned to the applicant and  co-accused Sheesh Pal. The allegation of causing injury is against the co-accused Sanjay and Anil. The case of the applicant is distinguishable with the case of Sanjay.

In reply to the above contention it is submitted by the learned A.G.A. that the applicant is threatening from the Jail.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Neeraj involved in case crime no. 399       of 2006  under Sections 302,307,504               I.P.C., P.S.Modi District Ghaziabad                           be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial to show his good conduct.

In default of the above condition it shall be open to the learned Session Judge concerned to canelhe bail  granted to him on the police report.

Dated: 1.12.2006

NA/26306/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.