Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sanjay Kumar Singh v. State Of U.P. & Others - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 15247 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20583 (5 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

Heard Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri P.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party no. 4 Shri Dhar  Singh, learned AGA and have perused the materials on  record.

Charges against opposite parties were framed on 16.11.2006. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that opposite party no. 4 absconded for delaying the trial and pressurised the sole eye witness of the case for not deposing against the accused persons. The learned counsel argued that the applicant who is complainant and sole eye witness is a sick man, suffering from serious ailment and apprehends his death any time, therefore, he wants conclusion of  trial expeditiously

The learned counsel for opposite party no. 4 submitted that plea for applicant's discharge was not heard.

Having taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties, the application is finally disposed of with the direction to the Additional Sessions Judge I, Jaunpur to conclude  the trial of S.T. No. 132 of 2006-State Versus Shri Dhar Singh under section 302 I.P.C. and section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police station Jalalpur, district Jaunpur within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy or receipt of  copy of this order.

Office is directed  to send a copy of the order to the District and Sessions Judge, Jaunpur for communication and compliance.

D.- 5.12.2006

Mahmood-15247-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.