Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUMAN DEVI versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Suman Devi v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 65954 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20593 (5 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

10

Hon'ble V. K. Shukla, J.

Petitioner had been performing and discharging duties as Anganbadi Karyakartri. Show cause notice was issued to her, to which she submitted reply on 28.09.2005. On 20.01.2006 services of the petitioner were dispensed with. After the said order has been passed, petitioner represented the matter on 20.03.2006 before Bal  Pariyojna Adhikari, Madhogarh, District Jalaun for redressal of her grievances and therein specific plea has been taken by the petitioner that detailed reply submitted by the petitioner has not at all been considered while passing the impugned order.

In this connection impugned order has been perused. Record in question reveals that various charges have been levelled against petitioner, and while dealing with the reply submitted by the petitioner, only this much has been said that it is not at all satisfactory. In normal course of business, once reply was going to be held to be satisfactory, then certaily some reasons ought to have been recorded, as to in what way and manner reply of the Petitioner was unsatisfactory. Once show cause notice was issued, reply was submitted, then it was bounden duty of the authority concerned to have considered the matter throughly and formed its opinion. In the present case said exercise  is lacking on the part of the authority concerned.

However, as the order dated 20.01.2006  has been passed, against which petitioner has preferred representation on 20.03.2006, as such Bal Vikas Pariyojna Adhikari, Madhogarh, District Jalaun is directed to look in to the matter and take appropriate decision by means of reasoned and speaking order, within  two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, after taking into the account the reply to show cause notice submitted  by the petitioner.

The earlier order dated 20.01.2006 shall abide by fresh order that may be passed by Bal Vikas Pariyojna Adhikari, Madhogarh, District Jalaun.          

The writ petition stands disposed of.

   

05.12.2006

SRY.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.