Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABLOO versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Babloo v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 26730 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20611 (6 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution version the alleged occurrence has taken place on 8.9.2006 at about 17.45, its F.I.R. was lodged on 9.9.2006  at about 7.30 a.m. The distance of the police station is about 8 k.m. from the place of incident. It has been clearly mentioned in the F.I.R. that  the first informant and another fled away on the threatening extended by the accused persons. In the morning when after search the dead body was recovered, the same was eaten by the wild animal. It is contended that the alleged occurrence has taken place in the dark hours of night and when in the morning the dead body was seen, then the present story was concocted. The deceased was accused in nine criminal cases.

In reply to the above contentions it is submitted by the learned A.G.A.  the the applicant remain absconding.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Babloo  involved in case crime no. 61       of 2006  under Sections 302             I.P.C.,P.S. Fariha District                           Firozabads be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned

Dated: 6.12.2006

NA/26730/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.