Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Hamid v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 26974 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20751 (8 December 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the applicant has been disclosed by the co-accused. The co-accused Irtafa has been released on bail by this court on 1.11.2006 in criminal misc. bail application no. 20222of 2006.

In reply of the above contention it is submitted by the learned A.G.A. that the accused are tempering the evidence and they are intimidating  and threatening the witnesses consequently two witnesses have filed affidavit.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Hamid involved in case crime no. 275        of 2006  under Sections 363,366,302,201 I.P.C., and (2)(3)(5) S.C./S.T. Act  P.S. Kotwali Dehat  District Bulandshahar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and he shall report to the police station  concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial to show his good behaviour.

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be  cancelled by the learned C.J.M. concerned on the police report.

Dated: 8.12.2006



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.