Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DEEPAK KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Deepak Kumar v. State Of U.P. - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 16385 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 20893 (12 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vijay Kumar Verma, J.

Heard Sri Shravan Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and also perused the record.

Having heard the applicant, the complaint in case crime No. 90A/2004 under Sections 323, 353, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Khaga District Fatehpur  (State versus Deepak Kumar) under Section 392 I.P.C. in which final report was submitted by the I.O. and when notice was issued to the applicant, he did not appear in the court below but the court below has issued non-bailable warrant against him while order dated 10.11.2006, which has been challenged in this case under Section 462 Cr.P.C.

Having heard the parties' counsel, I am of the considered view that the impugned order passed by the court below is highly illegal. In case, the applicant was not coming to Court to file objections against the final report, then the warrant cannot be issued and the final report could be accepted or some other order could be passed after going through the case diary but the Court below acted beyond its jurisdiction while issuing non-bailable warrant against the complainant.

Therefore, the impugned order dated 10.12.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate (Junior Division), Khaga, District Fatehpur in FI.R. case No. 11 of 2005 (State versus Deepak Kumar) under Sections 323, 353, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Khaga District Fatehpur is hereby quashed.

This case is finally decided accordingly.

12.12.2006

Yachna/Crl. Misc. App. No. 16385/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.