Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GEETA RAI versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Geeta Rai v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 68657 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 21189 (15 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

HON. R.P. MISRA,J.

HON.SHISHIR KUMAR, J.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Rajeshwar Tiwari and Sri A. Sahai for the respondent no.4, Sri S.B. Singh holding the brief of Sri Rajeev Sharma for respondent no.2 and Sri Sanjeev Singh for respondent no.3.

The petitioner has already made a representation, Annexure-5 to the writ petition dated 13.11.2006 to respondent no.4, Sanyukt Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Branch Nohahara, Ghazipur, though its Branch Manager and the same is pending.

In these circumstances we direct respondent no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioner, Annexure-5 to the writ petition within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him.

With the aforesaid directions the writ petition is disposed of.

15.12.2006

V.Sri/-

W.P. No.68656 of 2006

HON. R.P. MISRA,J.

HON.SHISHIR KUMAR, J.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Sri Rajeshwar Tiwari and Sri Shatrughna Singh holding the brief ofSri Nripendra Misra for the respondents no. 3 and 4, Sri S.B. Singh holding the brief of Sri Rajeev Sharma for respondent no.2.

The petitioner has already made a representation, Annexure-5 to the writ petition dated 6.11.2006 to respondent no.4, Union Bank of India, Branch-Dharani, Ghazipur though its Branch Manager and the same is pending.

In these circumstances we direct respondent no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioner, Annexure-5 to the writ petition within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him.

With the aforesaid directions the writ petition is disposed of.

15.12.2006

V.Sri/-

W.P. No.68657 of 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.