Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARI OM versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Hari Om v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 22643 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 21291 (18 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble  (Mrs.) Saroj Bala, J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Hari Om involved in case Crime No. 312 of 2006 under sections 376, 308, I.P.C., Police station Islam Nagar, district Budaun.

Heard Sri Arun Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri K.D.Tiwari, learned counsel for the complainant, learned AGA and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that first information report was lodged a month after the incident and delay has not been satisfactorily explained. The learned counsel argued that there is no medical evidence of rape. The learned counsel pointed out that the injured was not medically examined at government hospital.

The learned AGA and learned counsel for the complainant submitted that the applicant committed rape on the victim and caused head injury with the butt of the country made pistol. The learned counsel argued that there is criminal history of the applicant.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The first information report having been lodged a month after the incident, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Hari Om involved in case Crime No. 312 of 2006 under sections 376, 308, I.P.C., Police station Islam Nagar, district Budaun, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concern and subject to under mentioned conditions:

(i) the applicant shall appear before the  trial court or  investigating  agency as and when required

(ii) the applicant will not commit any other offence after  being released on bail.

(iii) the applicant shall not  tamper   with the evidence  by terrorising and inducing the witnesses..

D/-18.12.2006

Mahmood-22643-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.