Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANOJ KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Manoj Kumar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 21071 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 21399 (19 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Manoj Kumar  indicted in case crime No. 1131  of 2006  under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471  I.P.C. P.S. Nai Mandi  District Muzaffar Nagar.

Heard Shri G.P. Dixit , learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that co-accused Pravin Kumar Sharma had assured the complainant to get him a job of doctor in Ayurvedic Department as number of vacancies were available at Ghaziabad, Bareiily and Moradabad. The learned counsel urged that co-accused Pravin Kumar Sharma made a false representation that he had links with people of high position. The learned counsel argued that the cheque of Rs. four lacs was returned by the accused  Pravin Kumar Sharma and a subsequent complaint after dishonor  of the said cheque was made against him.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that payment of Rs. four lacs was made to the applicant and co-accused. The learned counsel argued that applicant and co-accused had disclosed that they have joint finance company and co-accused Pravin Kumar Sharma has been authorised to operate its accounts.  

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The cheque of Rs. four lac was issued by the co-accused Pravin Kumar Sharma and after dishonor of cheque the criminal complaint was filed against him In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Manoj Kumar  indicted in case crime No. 1131  of 2006  under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471  I.P.C. P.S. Nai Mandi  District Muzaffar Nagar , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/21071/06

19.12.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.