Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JEET PAL SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jeet Pal Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 21036 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 21461 (20 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an  application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Jeet Pal Singh   indicted in case crime No.601  of 2005 under sections 363, 506  I.P.C. P.S. Badhapur  District Bijnor.

Heard Shri Viresh Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the information about disappearance of the girl was given on 11.11.2005 but the First Information Report naming the applicant and co-accused was lodged on 22.12.2005 i.e. 42 days after the elopement of the girl. The learned counsel urged that some of the witnesses have stated having seen the girl going with co-accused Abhishek who was domestic servant of the complainant. The learned counsel argued that out of seven witnesses three witnesses have stated having seen the girl going away with applicant and co-accused.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that the girl is still untraceable.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of both the parties.

The applicant is in jail since July 2006. Out of seven witnesses four witnesses have stated having seen the girl going with co-accused Abhishek. According to the missing report dated 11.11.2005 the age of the girl was eighteen years. In view of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Jeet Pal Singh   indicted in case crime No.601  of 2005 under sections 363, 506  I.P.C. P.S. Badhapur  District Bijnor, be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/21036/06

20.12.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.