Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BACHCHA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Bachcha v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 28413 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 21636 (22 December 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. and Sri K.S. Tiwari, learned counsel for the complainant.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution version the alleged occurrence has taken place in a sudden quarrel. It was not pre-intended. It is alleged that the injuries were caused by by using kicks and fits blows by the applicant and other co-accused Natthu Chamar. The co-accused Natthu Chamar has been released on bail by this court.

In reply to the above contention it is submitted by the learned A.G.A. and the learned counsel for the complainant that  in case the applicant is released on bail he shall tamper with the evidence.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Baccha   involved in case crime no. 155  of 2005  under Sections 304,504      P.S. Atarra  District Banda be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and he shall report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial to show his good conduct.  

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel and he shall be taken into custody by the learned C.J.M. concerned.

Dated: 22.12.2006

NA/28413/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.