Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PIYUSH KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Piyush Kumar v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 2787 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 2256 (30 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

WP. No. 2787 of 2006

WP. No. 2790 of 2006

Issue notice.

Notice on behalf of the respondent no.1 has been accepted by the Standing Counsel, notice on behalf of the respondent no. 2 has been accepted  by Sri Pankaj Mithal and the notice on behalf of the respondent no. 3 has been accepted by Sri P.C. Srivastava and Sri Ram Raj.

Connect this writ petition along with W.P. no. 34404 of 2004

and list this case along  with that writ petition.

The respondents may proceed  with the election. However, till the next date of listing, result of the election will not be given effect to.

Dated:30.1.2006

RPP.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.