Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AMOL & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Amol & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 455 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 2315 (31 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble K.K. Misra,J.

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad,J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Gopal Singh, Advocate, from the side  of the complainant as well as  learned A.G.A on the prayer for bail.

Admit.

Summon the trial court record within three weeks.

So far as the appellant no.6 Hariom is concerned , he has not been assigned any role of shooting. So far as the appellant no. 1 Amol is concerned,   he has been given the role  of causing injuy by lathi     to the deceased on the leg.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that  appellant no. 6 Hariom and appellant no. 1 Amol       are  entitled  to be released on bail . Let appellant no. 6  Hariom and appellant no. 1 Amol  convicted  under section 147,148,  302/149  IPC and sentenced thereunder in Sessions Trial no. 127 of 1999  ( State Vs. Kadhora   &  others)  be released on bail during the pendency of appeal   on their    executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Mahoba.  

The C.J.M, Mahoba ,  shall send photocopies of personal and surety bonds executed and furnished by and on behalf of the accused- appellants to this Court soon thereafter.

So far as the appellants no.2,3, 4 and 5    are concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered on the receipt of record.

Realization of fine in respect of the appellants no. 6 and 1 shall remain stayed if Rs.2,500/-  out of the fine imposed by the trial court is deposited by each of  them within one month .

Dt.31.1.06

A/ 455/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.