High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Amol & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 455 of 2006  RD-AH 2315 (31 January 2006)
Hon'ble K.K. Misra,J.
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Gopal Singh, Advocate, from the side of the complainant as well as learned A.G.A on the prayer for bail.
Summon the trial court record within three weeks.
So far as the appellant no.6 Hariom is concerned , he has not been assigned any role of shooting. So far as the appellant no. 1 Amol is concerned, he has been given the role of causing injuy by lathi to the deceased on the leg.
Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that appellant no. 6 Hariom and appellant no. 1 Amol are entitled to be released on bail . Let appellant no. 6 Hariom and appellant no. 1 Amol convicted under section 147,148, 302/149 IPC and sentenced thereunder in Sessions Trial no. 127 of 1999 ( State Vs. Kadhora & others) be released on bail during the pendency of appeal on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Mahoba.
The C.J.M, Mahoba , shall send photocopies of personal and surety bonds executed and furnished by and on behalf of the accused- appellants to this Court soon thereafter.
So far as the appellants no.2,3, 4 and 5 are concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered on the receipt of record.
Realization of fine in respect of the appellants no. 6 and 1 shall remain stayed if Rs.2,500/- out of the fine imposed by the trial court is deposited by each of them within one month .
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.