Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH versus U.P. ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ashok Kumar Singh v. U.P. Road Transport Corporation And Others - WRIT - A No. 5590 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 2318 (31 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court no. 7

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5590 of 2006

                                                            Ashok Kumar Singh  

                                                             

                                                               Versus

                                                        U.P.S,.R.T.C.. and others

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari,J.

              Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

     The petitioner was engaged as driver in U.P.S.R.T.C. in 1998.

              It is alleged that the petitioner along with other drivers filed writ petition no.48316 of 2004 before this Court which was disposed of by order dated 22.2.2005 directing the Chief Secretary of the State Government to consider the case of the petitioner. Thereafter, the post of drivers were advertised in 2005 and applications were invited from the eligible candidates who were working as driver on contract basis in the Corporation. The petitioner appeared before the respondents along with documents.

   The grievance of the petitioner is that his documents have been scrutinized by the respondents and physical test including measurement etc. has also been done but the driving test has not been conducted till date. In this regard the petitioner has made a representation dated 5.10.2005 before respondent no.3 which has remained unactioned till date.

The only prayer of the counsel for the petitioner at this stage is that a direction may be issued to respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 5.10.2005 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) within a time bound frame fixed by this Court.

The standing counsel has no objection to this prayer.

In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of finally with a direction to respondent no.3 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 5.10.2005 by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order.

The petitioner shall file a certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within 15 days from today.

Dated 31.1.2006

CPP/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.