Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PARMA NAND versus III A.D.J.& OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Parma Nand v. Iii A.D.J.& Others - WRIT - A No. 14813 of 1982 [2006] RD-AH 2390 (31 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

(Court No. 51)

Civil Misc. Correction Application No. 22490 of 2006

In

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 14813 of 1982

Sri Parmanand Versus III Additional District Judge, Aligarh and others.

Hon'ble S.U.Khan J

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is a correction application seeking correction of my judgment dated 27.1.2006. In my judgment dated 27.1.2006, I wrongly mentioned that no reply to the supplementary affidavit dated 9.5.2005 filed by the tenant had been filed by the landlord. In fact supplementary counter affidavit of Chaman Lal to the said affidavit sworn on 17.5.2005 had been filed which was available on record. In the said supplementary counter affidavit it was stated that widow of the original landlord was aged about 98 years and she alongwith Chaman Lal one of the substituted sons of original landlord Diwan Chand was sometimes residing at Aligarh in the rented accommodation of one room and some times at Faridabad alongwith one of the sons of Chaman Lal in a rented house. It was also stated that Chaman Lal was not settled at Delhi, and one of his sons was unmarried and unemployed and Chaman Lal required the accommodation in dispute for himself, his wife, his younger son and his mother and under compulsion he was residing with his elder son at Delhi. It was also stated that Subhash Chandra petitioner No. 3 /4 was also not settled.

In the said supplementary counter affidavit an altogether new need has been set up which has got very little connection with the original need set up in the release application.

For fresh need fresh release application can always be filed.

Accordingly this application is disposed of with liberty to the landlords to file fresh release application after three years. This bar of three years is being provided due to the reason that tenant petitioner has been directed to pay the arrears of enhanced rent in three years through judgment and order dated 27.1.2006.

Waqar

31.1.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.