Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAKIB

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shakib-Ur-Rahman v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 6043 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 2424 (31 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J

Standing counsel represents respondent nos. 1 to 4. He prays for and is granted six weeks time to file counter affidavit. The petitioner will have three weeks thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit. List immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period.

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the entire amount payable under the impugned orders has already been deposited. If any amount has been deposited by the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned orders, the same shall be subject to the result of the writ petition. .

Dt. 31.1.2006

Sn/wp-6043/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.