High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Abdul Bari v. M.C. Sonkar And Another - CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. 752 of 1995  RD-AH 2761 (7 February 2006)
Hon. Tarun Agarwala,J.
The applicant alleges non-compliance of the order dated 21.10.1987. While affirming the order of termination the Court held that the petitioner would be entitled for compensation, if he was entitled under the Law. The applicant contends that the order was not complied inasmuch as the compensation was not paid and, therefore, the present contempt application was filed. In the opinion of the Court, no contempt proceedings can be filed against this order inasmuch as there was no contempt on the part of the opposite party. If the compensation was not paid, it was open to the applicant to approach the appropriate forum for the redressal of his grievance. Contempt is not the appropriate form.
In view of the aforesaid, the contempt proceedings are dropped, the notices are discharged and the contempt application is dismissed.
AKJ. (CA 752/95)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.