Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHIV MUNI PRASAD & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECY. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shiv Muni Prasad & Another v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. & Others - WRIT - C No. 22553 of 2005 [2006] RD-AH 283 (4 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J.

An application for recall has been filed for recalling the judgment and order dated 6th April, 2005 dismissing the writ petition in default. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the said application, we are satisfied that the Counsel was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing on 6th April, 2005. We accordingly allow the restoration application, recall the order dated 6th April, 2005 and restore the writ petition to its original number.

Heard on merit.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents and have perused the material available on record.

The letter dated 15th June, 2002, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-12 to the writ petition, clearly shows that the petitioner does not possess the licence to run the Saw Mill. In such circumstances, the relief claimed for by the petitioner that the respondents should not interfere in the running of the Saw Mill, cannot be granted. Petition is accordingly dismissed.

However, this order shall not prevent the petitioner from filing a fresh application in accordance with law before the authority concerned for grant of fresh licence in accordance with the judgment given by us in the case of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 47307 of 2005, Chaudhary Chandan Singh Vs. State of U. P. & Ors., decided on 05.07.2005

The petitioner shall produce a copy of the aforesaid judgment before the authority concerned along with the application for grant of fresh licence and the authority concerned shall consider the application in accordance with the aforesaid judgment.

04.01.2005

AHA


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.