High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Nagendra Pratap Singh @ Nagendra Prasad v. State Of U.P. & Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 1385 of 2006  RD-AH 2834 (7 February 2006)
Hon'ble Amitava Lala,J.
Hon'ble Shiv Shanker,J.
The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the F.I.R. has been lodged on the basis of an enquiry without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing. Therefore the petitioner is aggrieved. According to us avenue towards miscellaneous writ jurisdiction is available for the same. Court of Criminal writ jurisdiction is not made for it. It is restricted only on the F.I.R. Prima facie we see that the F.I.R. is based on enquiry. Under such circumstances, we have no other alternative but to proceed on such basis.
The principle of 2005 ADJ (All) (Asha Devi Vs State of U.P.& Ors) is applicable on the factual basis of each and every case. In the present case basis of the F.I.R. is the enquiry report. Therefore, we can not interfere with the matter.
The writ petition is thus dismissed. No order is passed as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.