High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Rahul Jain Neeraj v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 7129 of 2006  RD-AH 2844 (7 February 2006)
Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.
It is alleged by the petitioner that the school of his uncle is running on the part of Gata No. 355. It is also alleged by the petitioner that the entire Gata No. 355 is permanent ownership/bhumidhari of the petitioner or his uncle, yet according to the petitioner the respondents no. 1 to 5 are trespassing upon vacant part of Gata No. 355 without acquiring the same and are trying to construct a Junior High School over that land.
If these allegations are correct it would amount trespassing or encroachment by the respondents for which remedy of civil suit for injunction including temporary injunction is available to the petitioner.
No good ground has been shown why the petitioner should be permitted to by-pass the normal remedy, and to approach this Court in its extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
In the circumstances, we decline to interfere in this matter with the clarification that the observations made above, will not influence the trial Court if any injunction suit is filed.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.