TAFFAZUL @ REMATULLAH & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Taffazul @ Rematullah & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 619 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 3015 (8 February 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble K.K. Misra, J.

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A.

Admit.

It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Nothing has been recovered and dead body has been recovered from open place. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that chain of events is not complete.

Let appellants-Taffazul @ Rematullah and Ibrahim @ Chinnu be enlarged on bail on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar in S.T. No.34/2001, State Vs. Taffazul and others, under Sections 302/201 and 120B I.P.C., subject to their depositing Rs.2500/- as fine within a period of one month from today.

8.2.2006

OP/619/06

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.