Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DR. D.N. SHUKLA versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dr. D.N. Shukla v. State of U.P. and others - WRIT - C No. 7887 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 3064 (10 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

This petition has been filed for a direction upon the Allahabad Development Authority, Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as the ''Development Authority') to stop the constructions of the second floor of the house belonging to the petitioner and to demolish the constructions already raised by private respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.K. Misra, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. In view of the order that we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Learned Standing Counsel appears for respondent No.1.

Sri A.K. Misra, learned counsel appearing for the Development Authority has pointed out that a notice dated 10.1.206 has already been issued to respondent No.4 calling upon him to show cause by 17.1.2006. This notice has been issued under the provisions of Section 27 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.

In view of the aforesaid fact that the Development Authority has already issue a show cause notice to respondent No.4, we are not inclined to entertain this petition at this stage. We, therefore, dismiss this petition with the observation that appropriate orders shall be passed by the Development Authority after receipt of the reply from the respondent No.4. The Development Authority must further ensure that no constructions are raised in violation of the Act/Rules/Bye-laws.

Dt/-10.2.2006

Sharma/7887


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.