Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MALUKA & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Maluka & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 342 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 3101 (10 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble K.K. Misra,J.

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad,J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and Sri R.P.S. Chauhan, Advocate from the side of the complainant as well as  learned A.G.A on the prayer for bail.

Admit.

Summon the trial court record within three weeks.

So for as the five persons namely, appellant nos. 8 Harpal, appellant no. 9, Shree Pal, appellant no.10, Bhabhuti, appellant no. 11 Raidas and appellant no. 12, Omkar are concerned,they have been given the role of causing injuries by gun shot to the  deceased. The deceased had received only one gun shot injury.    

Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that  appellant nos. 8 Harpal, appellant no. 9, Shree Pal, appellant no.10, Bhabhuti, appellant no. 11 Raidas and appellant no. 12, Omkar are        entitled  to be released on bail . Let  appellant nos. 8 Harpal, appellant no. 9, Shree Pal, appellant no.10, Bhabhuti, appellant no. 11 Raidas and appellant no. 12, Omkar  convicted  under section   148/302/149/307/149/147  IPC and sentenced thereunder in Sessions Trial no. 120 of 1993  ( State Vs. Maluka     &  others)  be released on bail during the pendency of appeal   on their     executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Badaun .  

The C.J.M, Badaun ,  shall send photocopies of personal and surety bonds executed and furnished by and on behalf of the accused- appellants to this Court soon thereafter.

So far the remaining  appellants no. 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15 and 16 are concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered on the receipt of the record.

List this case on 27.3.2006.

Realization of fine in respect of the appellants no. 8,9, 10,11 and 12  shall remain stayed if Rs.2,500/-  out of the fine imposed by the trial court is deposited by each of them   within one month .

Dt.10.2.06

A/ 342/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.