High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Vijay Prakash @ Timak & Others v. State Of U.P. & Another - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 838 of 2006  RD-AH 3178 (10 February 2006)
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we are of the view that the concerned F.I.R., should not be interfered with in the present case particularly on the basis of the guidelines framed by the Supreme Court in the case as reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 (State of Haryana and others Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal and others).
Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed.
No order is passed as to costs.
However, in case petitioners/petitioner appear/appears or produce before the court concerned and apply/applies for bail in connection with Case Crime No. 492 of 2005, under Sections 147,148,323,504,379,427,332,353,336 I.P.C. and under Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Bishunpura, Kushinagar, District Kushinagar the same shall be decided in accordance with law and only for expeditious disposal the ratio of judgement of this Court as reported in 2004 (All. C.J.) 1846 (Smt. Amrawati and another vs. State of U.P.) can be followed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.