High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Chotel Lal v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 8691 of 2006  RD-AH 3326 (14 February 2006)
HON. ARUN TANDON, J.
From the records it is established that the petitioner has not worked subsequent to June, 1998. Counsel for the petitioner has also not been able to point out any paragraph of the writ petition or any document filed in support thereof on the basis whereof he could establish that the petitioner has worked subsequent to June, 1998.
In view of the aforesaid fact situation petitioners has no right for being considered for regularization/ appointment against Class IV vacancy on any preferential basis. The relief prayed for in the present writ petition are totally misconceived.
If the petitioner possess the requisite qualification for Class IV post with reference to the Advertisement which has been published he may apply for fresh recruitment. His application shall be processed in accordance with law.
Writ petition is dismissed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.