Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATIRAM versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Satiram v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 7661 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 3419 (14 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

                                                                                       Court No.5.

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 7661 of 2006

Satiram.                            Vs.              State of U.P. and others.

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J.

            Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted a fishery lease on 17.1.1996 for the period of ten years and that the period of the lease has expired on 17.1.2006 and as yet fishery lease has not been settled thereafter in favour of any person. The petitioner has filed a representation before the District Magistrate, Ghazipur on 8.2.2006 for removing the fish crop sown by the petitioner, which are said to be still lying in the Gaon Sabha pond and which the petitioner could not take out.

              I have heard Sri S.K. yadav holding brief of Sri Anuj Kumar, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha also.

              It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner will file a fresh representation in this regard before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jakhania, Ghazipur. In case such a representation is filed within a week from today the same shall be considered by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jakhania, Ghazipur in accordance with law.

                 With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of.

                 Copy of this order be made available to the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of three days on payment of usual charges.

14.2.2006.

s.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.