Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KM. ALKA MISHRA versus VICE CHANCELLOR BUNDELKHAND UNIVERISTY, JHANSI & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Km. Alka Mishra v. Vice Chancellor Bundelkhand Univeristy, Jhansi & Others - WRIT - C No. 9283 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 3536 (15 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Vineet Saran, J

Heard Sri M.C.Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri M.P.S.Niranjan, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of finally even without calling for a counter affidavit.

It is the case of the petitioner that she had appeared in B.Ed. Entrance Examination 2005 and was called for counseling but her candidature has been rejected as she has not been given the advantage of the weightage of 15 marks to which she claims to be entitled to on the basis of teacher's ward certificate having been issued in her favour. The submission is that in case if the due weightage of being teacher's ward is given to the petitioner, she would be in the select list for admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that in this regard the petitioner has already filed several representations before the respondent-authorities, which have yet not been decided.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction that in case if, with regard to her grievances made in this writ petition, the petitioner files a fresh comprehensive representation before the Registrar, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, respondent no.2 alongwith a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no.2 himself or through any other competent officer duly authorized by him, in accordance with law, by a speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of filing of the same.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is finally disposed of.    

Dt/-15.2.2006

Ru/w.p.9283.06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.