Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHD. YUSUF versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohd. Yusuf v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 9683 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 3705 (16 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO.34

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.9683 of 2006

Mohd. Yusuf

Versus

State of U.P. & Ors.

Hon'ble Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J.

The principal relief claimed in the present petition is to provide medical facilities to the petitioner in accordance with the Government Orders dated 30.11.1977, 03,06.1980 and 09.08.2004.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner after retirement from the post of Chief Pharmacist in District Hospital, Budaun on 31.07.1996, has spent a lot of money on his ill health but the respondents have not reimbursed the said amount.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2. In view of the order that we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to other respondents.

Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the petitioner may file a detailed representation before the Chief Medical Superintendent, Budaun raising all the grievances sought to be raised in this petition and the same shall be disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.

In view of the above, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction that in the event petitioner files a detailed representation before the Chief Medical Superintendent, Budaun, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of filing a certified copy of this order before him, after hearing the parties.

16.02.2006

AHA


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.