VIJAY KUMAR SETH AND ANOTHER versus RAHMAT ULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Vijay Kumar Seth And Another v. Rahmat Ullah Khan And Others - WRIT - C No. 9729 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 3771 (16 February 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

HON'BLE UMESHWAR PANDEY, J.

Heard Sri R.K. Jain, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the respondent has raised preliminary objection that two orders passed on two different issues have been made subject of challenge in this petition. Instead of one the petitioners should have filed two petitions. Sri Jain submits that he shall pay the second court fees on this petition itself and that will solve the purpose. The petitioner may make the deficiency as per the aforesaid requirement good within 24 hours.

The learned counsel for the respondents requests that he may be given a week's time and no more for filing the counter affidavit. Sri Jain requests for two weeks' time to file  rejoinder affidavit thereafter. The requests are granted.

List thereafter on 24.3.2006.

16.2.2006

SUA/9729-06

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.