Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TAHKALAN KISAN SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD. versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Tahkalan Kisan Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 1807 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 4005 (20 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.1

Civil Misc.Writ Petition No. 1807 of 2006

Tahkalam Kisan Sewa Sahkari  Samiti Ltd. Vs.  State of U.P. & others

Connected with

Civil Misc.Writ Petition No. 1805 of 2006

Samodiya Kisan Sewa Sahkari  Samiti Ltd. Vs.  State of U.P. & others

Hon'ble  Yatindra Singh,J

Hon'ble  R.K.Rastogi,J

1. These are  two writ petitions against the   order dated 27.12.2005 passed  by respondent no.2 cancelling  the fair price shop licence  of the petitioner.

2. We have heard  the  counsel for the petitioner and  Standing Counsel for the   respondents

3. According to the counsel  for the   petitioner  no  opportunity was given  to the petitioner before passing the impugned order. On this writ petition a month's time was granted to file counter  affidavit  but no counter affidavit  has been  filed  so far.  

4.             In the circumstances of the case , the petitioner may  file a representation  before the respondent no. 2 within one month. In case the representation is filed it may be decided  by the respondent  no.2  by a reasoned order at an early date,  if possible, within  three   months from the date of receipt of representation . The petitioner will  file  a certified copy of this order; necessary  documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope  alongwith the representation. The concerned   authority after taking   decision will  communicate the same to the petitioner.

5. Till the  representation   of the petitioner  is not decided, the  impugned order shall be kept in abeyance.

6. With these observations    the  writ petitions are  disposed of.

20.2.2006

MLK/9


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.