Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PUNWANYA SAHKARI CHINI MILL THRU' GENERAL SECRETARY versus U.P. CO

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Punwanya Sahkari Chini Mill Thru' General Secretary v. U.P. Co-Op. Sugar Mill Federation Ltd. Thru' M.D. And Others - WRIT - A No. 7772 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 4081 (21 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.7

Civil Misc. Writ No.7772 of 2006

Punwanya Sahkari Chini Mill Bhartiya Majdoor Sangh Punwanya, District Shahjahanpur through its General Secretary.  

                                                                  ...        Petitioner  

                                        Versus                                                                                                                                                                                                   U.P. Co-operative Sugar Mill Federation Ltd. Lucknow and others                                                             ...    Respondents

                                                             

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J

           Heard counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

It is alleged that a settlement was arrived at between the office bearers of the Management of the Mill and the petitioner union on 9.3.2005.  Aggrieved against the part of the settlement the petitioner has made a representation dated 9.1.2006 before respondent no.1 which has remained unactioned till date, hence this petition.

The only prayer of the counsel for the petitioner at this stage is that a direction may be issued to respondent no.1 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 9.1.2006 within a time bound frame fixed by this Court.

The standing counsel has no objection to this prayer.

In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of finally with a direction to respondent no.1 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 9.1.2006 by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order.

The petitioner shall file a certified copy of this order before respondent no.1 within 15 days from today.

Dated 21.2.2006

CPP/-

           


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.