Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NEW ADARSH INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION GHAZIABAD versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


New Adarsh Institute Of Education Ghaziabad v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 10743 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 4208 (22 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 36

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.  10743 of 2006

New Adarsh Institute

of Education, Loni     ------- Petitioner

Versus

State of U.P. & Ors. ------- Respondents

     ----------------

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.

Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anurag Khanna, Shri Neeraj Tripathi for the Chancellor and learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Rajiv Joshi for NCTE.

The petitioner's educational institution has been granted recognition by the NCTE for running B.Ed. Course for the academic session 2004-05. Temporary affiliation had also been granted to the petitioner's institution by the Chancellor affiliating the petitioner for the said course to the Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut.

The University after inspection of the University, penal had made a recommendation for permanent affiliation. The matter is pending before the Chancellor and has not been decided.

In the circumstances, we dispose of this writ petition finally requiring the Chancellor to take a decision in the matter with reasons within two months of the date on which certified copy of this order is presented before the Chancellor. It is further directed that in case the Chancellor finds some defect because of which he proposes not to grant affiliation, the defects will be pointed out to the petitioner in writing and the petitioner will be given a reasonable amount of time for rectifying those defects to the satisfaction of the Chancellor. The affiliation will not be rejected straightway without affording such opportunity to the petitioner. However, if any such defect has been pointed out by the Chancellor, a period of two months will be given which will run from the date on which it is communicated to the petitioner so that the petitioner rectifies the defect and intimates the same to the Chancellor.

Till the decision is taken by the Chancellor, the temporary affiliation granted to the petitioner will continue, but not beyond the academic session 2005-06.

22.2.2006

VKS


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.