Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Ashok Kumar Singh And Othres v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 11598 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 4422 (24 February 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court No.7

Civil Misc. Writ No. 11598 of 2006

Ashok Kumar Singh and others                   ...    Petitioners


State of U.P. and others                                           - Respondents


Counsel for the petitioners:-  Sri G.K. Singh and Sri V.K. Singh,  


Counsel for the respondents: Standing counsel and

                                              Sri V.N. Upadhaya, Advocate



Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J

           Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

The petitioners are working as Revenue Inspectors in Jal Sansthan, Varanasi.

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents-authorities to fix the salary of the petitioners in the pay scale of Rs. 1200-1800 and for a direction to the respondents  to pay the arrears of the petitioners with effect from the issuance of the Government Order dated 19th August, 1996 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition).

The petitioners have also made several representations in this regard before the respondents-authorities, which have remained unactioned till date.

The only prayer of the counsel for the petitioners at this stage is that a direction may be issued to respondent no.1, Secretary, Nagar Vikas Anubhag, Government of U.P. Lucknow  to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners dated 3.2.2006 within a time bound frame fixed by this Court.

The standing counsel has no objection to this prayer.

In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of finally with a direction to respondent no.1 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 3.2.2006 by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order.

The petitioners shall file a certified copy of this order before respondent no.1 within two weeks from today.

Dated 24.2.2006




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.