High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Peeyush Kant v. Union Of India And Others - WRIT - A No. 494 of 2006  RD-AH 445 (6 January 2006)
HON. ARUN TANDON, J.
Heard Sri Sadhu Sharan Advocate on behalf of the petitioner and Sri K.C. Sinha Advocate on behalf of the respondents.
In the impugned order dated 11th June, 2005 it is recorded that if the petitioner feels aggrieved, he may prefer an appeal to the office of the undersigned within the time specified. The petitioner has not preferred such an appeal till date and has approached this Court directly.
Writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy, as has been referred to in the impugned order itself.
It is, however, provided that in case the petitioner files an appeal, as directed under the order dated 11th June, 2005, within two weeks from today along with certified copy of this order, in the office of Senior Record Officer, Jabalpur, the appeal shall be entertained with raising any objection with regards to delay, if any, in filing of the appeal and shall be decided by the competent authority strictly in accordance with law by means of a reasoned speaking order, preferably within eight weeks from the date the appeal is so filed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.