Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SARDAR SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sardar Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 60 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 466 (6 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 19

Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.60 of 2006

Sardar Singh @ Jai Singh .....Vs.....State of U.P.

...

Hon'ble Alok Kumar Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and also perused the material on record.

The applicant Sardar Singh @ Jai Singh is involved in case crime No. 157 of 2005, for the offence under Sections  302, 387 I.P.C. and 10/12 (D.A.A. Act), Police Station Kurara, district Hamirpur.

In the  context of genuineness of the prosecution case and proposed  supporting evidence, it was  pointed out that the role which has been assigned  to the applicant is that of only exhortation as would be evident from the perusal  of the F.I.R. (annexure-1). The main role of the firing is that of co-accused Papdu Singh (non applicant). There is no criminal history to his credit.  

The bail is, however, opposed by the learned A.G.A.

The points pertaining to nature of accusation, severity of punishment, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses, prima facie satisfaction of the Court  regarding  proposed evidence and genuineness of the prosecution  case were duly considered.

In view of the entire facts and circumstances of the case, taking into  consideration some of the arguments, advanced on behalf of the applicant in respect of the points discussed herein above, without prejudice to the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court.  

Dt. 5.1.2006.

Rkb.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.