Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

IKRAM KHAN versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ikram Khan v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 3776 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 4698 (28 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to prosecution version the alleged occurrence had taken place at about 6.30 p.m. on 29.1.2005. The dead body was found  inside a field. It is said that the applicant and other co-accused Fandan Khan fired indiscriminately. Consequently, the deceased received injuries. The injuries were caused while the deceased was running towards the field. It is contended that the prosecution story is not corroborated by the post mortem report, because according to post mortem report injuries no. 1,2 and 6 are incised wound and injury no. 4 is abrasion. The incised are unexplained. The injury no. 3 shows that it was having blackening around the bone. The shot was fired from closed range. The story of causing injury while the deceased was running towards the field is belied by these injuries.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without entering into the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Ikram Khan  involved in Case Crime No. 64 of 2005, under Section 302 I.P.C., Police Station Bhojipura, District Bareilly be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two  sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dt: 28.2.2006

Rcv/3776-06                                                                                                  

                                                                                                                                       


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.