High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Kiran Pal v. Ghaziabad Development Authority Thru' Chairman And Others - WRIT - A No. 12150 of 2006  RD-AH 4708 (28 February 2006)
Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari ,J
Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
Petitioner claims that he was appointed on the post of Security Guard by respondent no. 2 vide order dated 8.2.1989 and he worked as such till April,2002. In connection with an incident of 23.4.2002, the services of the petitioner were terminated vide order dated 29.4.2002. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite his repeated representations, the respondent authorities are not paying any heed to his legitimate prayer.
The only prayer of counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent no. 2 may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 16.12.2005 (Annexure 8 to the writ petition) within some time frame.
Counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the revision of the petitioner dated 16.12.2005 (Annexure 8 to the writ petition) by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law within six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. No order as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.