Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NARENDRA SINGH & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECY. TO GOVT. & ANR.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Narendra Singh & Others v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. To Govt. & Anr. - WRIT - C No. 52640 of 2004 [2006] RD-AH 4740 (28 February 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Writ Petition No. 52640 of 2004

HON'BLE YATINDRA SINGH, J

HON'BLE R.K. RASTOGI, J.

1. This writ petition is for a direction to the respondent to reconnect the electricity connection of the petitioner.

2. We have heard counsel for the petitioner, standing counsel and Sri WH Khan for the respondents. The petitioner is permitted to implead respondent no. 3. Counter and rejoinder affidavit have already been exchanged and as such the writ petition is disposed of at this stage finally.

3. The respondent while filing counter affidavit have indicated that reconnection can not be granted as there are dues of bills against the petitioner. The details of the bills are already annexed as CA-2 to the counter affidavit.  In case the petitioner disputes the bills, he may file his objection before respondent no. 3 otherwise reconnection may be granted after the entire arrears are paid.  In case any such objection is filed, it may be decided by respondent no. 3 by a speaking order, if possible, within three-months from the date of receipt of the objection. The petitioner will file certified copy of this order; other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with the objection.  Respondent no. 3 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.  

4. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.  

Dated: 28.2.2005

SKS  


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.