High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Smt. Murati Devi v. Director Of U.P. Bal Vikas Evam Pustahar Bibhag And Others - WRIT - A No. 760 of 2006  RD-AH 485 (6 January 2006)
HON. ARUN TANDON, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
It is stated that the petitioner, who was appointed as Anganbari Sahayeeka, has been orally restrained from discharging her duties by the Bal Vikash Pariyozana Adhikari, Pharenda, District Maharajganj (respondent no.3). Against the said action of respondent no.3, the petitioner has already made a detailed representation before Director of U.P. Bal Vikash Evam Pustahar, Vibhag, Lucknow (respondent no.1) by registered post (a copy whereof has been enclosed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition). Hence the present writ petition.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.1 to consider and decide the representation made by the petitioner (Annexure-4 to the writ petition), strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned speaking order, within four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with an attested copy of the representation is made before the respondent no.1.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.