SURENDRA KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Surendra Kumar v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 10559 of 2005 [2006] RD-AH 4913 (1 March 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J

Office report dated 4.10.2005 indicates that notices were sent to respondent nos. 5, 6, 9 and 10 by registered post but neither acknowledgements nor undelivered covers have been received back after service.

Service upon respondent nos. 5, 6, 9 and 10 is treated as sufficient under Chapter VIII Rule 12 of the Rules of the Court.

Counsel for the petitioner may take fresh steps for service upon respondent nos. 7 and 8 by registered post.

Dt.1.3.2006

Sn/wp-10559/05

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.