Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM KUMAR @ PAKKA versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Kumar @ Pakka v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4279 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 5005 (2 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. Th alleged abducted person has been recovered from a open field by the police. The recovery was not made from the possession of the applicant. The name of the applicant was disclosed by abducted person. There is no allegation in respect of demand of ransom. The abducted person has returned back unhurt. The case of the applicant is distinguishable with the case of other-co-accused person.

It is opposed by the learned A.G.A. by submitting that the applicant is having criminal antecedents.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without entering into the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Raj Kumar alias Pakka involved in Case Crime No. 297 of 2004, under Sections 364 I.P.C., Police Station Jalalabad, District Shahjahanpur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall appear in the court of learned C.J.M. in the first week of each month. In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel.

Dt: 02.03.2006

Rcv/4279-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.