Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SACHCHITA NAND DUBEY versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sachchita Nand Dubey v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 13245 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 5138 (3 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Civil Misc. W.P. No.  13245 of 2006

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.

Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.

The vehicle of the petitioner has been seized on account of certain alleged shortcomings. According to the petitioner, these shortcomings are not present and he can demonstrate before the transport authorities under section 207 or before the Magistrate, if the matter is sent to the Magistrate by the transport authorities that these shortcomings did not exist. The petitioner further submits that if any shortcoming is found, the petitioner is prepared to pay whatever fine is imposed for the shortcoming.

In the circumstances, we dispose of this writ petition finally requiring the Regional Transport Authority, Mirzapur, respondent No. 2, to consider the application for release of the vehicle of the petitioner by a reasoned order after considering the documents submitted by the petitioner to show that the shortcomings pointed out in the seizure memo did not exist, within 15 days from the date on which certified copy of this order is submitted along with the details of the application for release supported by photocopies of the relevant documents.

In the alternative, the respondent No. 2 will send the matter to the Court of the concerned Magistrate within the same period of 15 days and in that event, it will be open to the petitioner to apply for release before the concerned Magistrate.  

Dated : March 3, 2006

AM/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.