High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Surendra & Another v. The Dy. Director Of Consolidation, Ballia & Others - WRIT - B No. 12863 of 2006  RD-AH 5174 (3 March 2006)
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12863 of 2006
Surendra and Another
Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ballia & Others
Hon'ble Krishna Murari, J.
Heard Sri Shyam Narain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
At the stage of consolidation proceedings the petitioners were proposed three chaks which included major part of their original holdings. An objection under Section 20 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act was filed by them raising a grievance that the first chak be demolished and plot no. 171 be taken out from their second chak and instead plot nos. 170, 562 and 583 be allotted. The Consolidation Officer vide order dated 7.7.2004 dismissed the objection on the ground that the first chak is proposed on plot no. 477 which is their original holding and the second chak includes major part of plot no. 170 which again is the original holding.. Feeling aggrieved the petitioners filed an appeal. The Settlement Officer Consolidation vide order dated 31.12.2004 partly allowed the appeal of the petitioners. The Settlement Officer Consolidation took out plots no. 171/1 and 171/2 from the chaks of the petitioners and instead allotted plots no. 556, 557, 558 and 562 in their chaks. Still not statisfied petitioners went up in revision. The revisional court vide order dated 29.12.2005 dismissed the revision. The rivisional court has also recorded a finding all the three chaks allotted to the petitioner are on major part of their original holding.
The Settlement Officer Consolidation while allowing the appeal filed by the petitioner considering their grievance had taken out ''Uran' number from their chaks and allowed them plots no. 556, 557, 558, and 562.
In view of the findings recorded by the three courts below that all the three chaks of the petitioners are on major part of their original holdings, there is no scope for interference in the impugned judgements.
The writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.