Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. SADIQA AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' HOME SECY. LUCKNOW AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Sadiqa And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru' Home Secy. Lucknow And Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 2783 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 5321 (6 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Amitava Lala, J.

Hon'ble Shiv Shanker, J.

We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned A.G.A.. We have also gone through the F.I.R. in question, which prima facie discloses the commission of an offence inter alia under Section 498-A I.P.C.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we finally dispose of the writ petition by directing that the petitioners shall not be arrested in Case Crime No. 172 of 2006, under Sections  498-A, 504 I.P.C. and ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kotwali, Amohar, District J.P. Nagar till the trial starts, provided they pay interim compensation to the victim @ Rs. 5000/- per month from today. Such interim compensation from today upto 31.03.2006 shall be deposited in the Court of concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate by 07th April, 2006 and for all subsequent months by 07th day of the following month. The victim shall be entitled to withdraw the same. The liability to pay interim compensation shall be joint as well as individual of all the petitioners.

This order for payment of interim compensation is based on the analogy of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bodhisattwa Gautam Vs. Subhra Chakraborty (AIR 1996 SC 922).

In case of failure in payment of interim compensation, the order staying the arrest of the petitioners shall stand vacated automatically.

Dt./- 06.03.2006.

SKT/2783-06.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.