High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Pawan v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4955 of 2005  RD-AH 5424 (7 March 2006)
Hon'ble K.K. Misra, J.
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, Sri D.R. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A.
The contention of learned counsel for the appellants is that two appellants Pawan and Sonu have been given the role of causing injuries to the deceased by Pharsas. The deceased has received only one injury. The other injury is not on vital part of the body. We have perused the statement of P.W.2 and P.W.3 and heard learned counsel for the complainant. It has not come on the record that who has caused injury to the deceased.
During pendency of appeal, let appellant-Pawan be enlarged on bail in S.T. No. 24 of 2005 (Connected S.T. No. 25/05), State Vs. Sonu and others, Case Crime No. 99/04, Under Sections 302/147/148/149/323/324/504/506 I.P.C., and Section 4/25 of Arms Act, P.S. Jarcha, District Gautam Budh Nagar on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gautam Budh Nagar.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.