CHANDAN versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Chandan v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1215 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 5693 (9 March 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.

Hon'ble R.N. Misra, J.

Admit.

Issue notice.

Summon the trial court record at an early date.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned .A.G.A for the State.  

The only role assigned to the appellant is of catching hold. The role of firing was assigned to the other co-accused Sukhey. The case of the appellant is distinguishable from the case of other co-accused.

In the circumstances, let the appellant, Chandan, convicted and sentenced in S.T. No. 570/99 (State Vs. Sukhey & others) shall be released on bail during the pendency of this appeal before this court on his furnishing a personal bond alongwith two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Budaun.

Realisation of fine shall remain stayed.  

Dated : 9.3.2006

S.B.

Crl. A. 1215/06  

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.